|
|
Comments: This 12-week study found no differences between groups of pts with tx-refractory MDD treated with tranylcypromine or venlafaxine + mirtazapine in rates of remission (HAM-D < 7 or QIDS-SR < 5) or response (>50% reduction from baseline QIDS-SR score). A significantly larger proportion of subjects treated with tranylcypromine dropped out of the study 2/2 inability to tolerate tx. Strengths: study directly compares two interventions; important study given relative paucity of research data in populations with tx-refractory depression. Weaknesses: open-label design; between group differences at baseline could potentially effect results (e.g. larger proportion of pts in V+M group were treated with mirtazapine in step 3); amount of time in tx was different between groups (larger proportion of subjects in T group were in tx < 4 weeks, including 2 week washout period)—did this bias results to show less improvement from baseline?; mean dose of tranylcypromine (36.9 mg/day) did not approach higher doses (70-120 mg/day) shown to be more effective. Bottom Line: In a 12-week randomized, open-label trial of 109 subjects with MDD, who did not experience remission or were unable to tolerate 3 preceding medications trials, treated with tranylcypromine or venlafaxine+mirtazapine, there were no differences between groups in rates of remission (HAM-D < 7 or QIDS-SR < 5) or response (>50% reduction from baseline QIDS-SR score). The proportion of subjects treated with tranylcypromine who withdrew from the study 2/2 tx intolerability was significantly higher than that of the venlafaxine+mirtazapine group.
AUTHOR: Carbamazepine Capsules as Monotherapy for Acute Mania in Bipolar Disorder Chairman’s Rounds, September 9, 2006 Citation: Weisler, RH et al. ‘Extended-Release Carbamazepine Capsules as Monotherapy for Acute Mania in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial’. J Clin Psychiatry 2005; 66:323-330. Clinical Question: What is the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with extended-release carbamazepine in patients with bipolar I disorder experiencing manic or mixed episodes? Background Info: Carbamazepine has been long used in the treatment of bipolar disorder, however its efficacy was proven only recently in a well conducted study. Due to the limitations in response and tolerability of the available agents to treat bipolar disorder, the availability of additional options is likely to improve outcomes. Question Type: Therapy Validity Criteria for Appropriate Question Type: Follow-up: 144 patients (60.3%) completed the study. All but 4 patients who entered the trial were properly accounted for and attributed at its conclusion. Randomization: Randomized. Intention to treat: from the 239 patients, 235 were included in the intention to treat sample. Similar groups: There were no important differences between groups. Blinding: Double blinded. Equal treatment: There was equal treatment aside from the intervention. Non intervention treatment: Lorazepam prn was the only additional medication allowed. Study Design Type: Randomized Controlled Trial Relevant Criteria for Appropriate Design: Allocation: Randomized (no comments on how randomization was achieved). Blinding: Double blind (no comments on how blinding was achieved). Follow up period: 21 days, following a 5 day single-blind placebo lead in period. Setting: 25 study sites (19 US and 6 in India). There is no comment on what kind of study sites these were - university, community, public, or private. Patients/Population: n= 239. >18 y/o. DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder most current episode manic or mixed, with a prior manic or mixed episode, with YMRS score of > 20. Information was not given on how these patients were recruited. Intervention/ exposure: Extended Release Carbamazepine (beaded capsules) up to 1600 mg daily (started at 200 mg and titrated by 200 mg daily). Outcomes: Primary outcome was change in YMRS total score. Secondary outcomes included: responder rate (defined as decrease> 50% in YMRS score), change in CGI and HAM-D scores and time to outpatient status. Patient Follow Up: 144 completed the study. 95 terminated prematurely: 4 lost to follow up, 17 adverse effects, 35 lack of efficacy, 13 protocol violations, 4 other. Main Results: Primary outcome: Treatment group with statistically significant decreases in YMRS scores at day 7, 14 and 21 compared to placebo (Last observation carried forward analysis in ITT sample p <.0001 at all points) Figure 1. Secondary outcomes: ERC-CBZ patients had significantly higher response rates on all measured days (p<0.0001), with by my calculations a relative risk of 2.1 at the end point. CGI-S and CGI-I scales scores were significantly improved in the treatment group (p<.0001), as were HAM-D scores (p<.01). 48.3% in ERC-CBZ group vs. 34.8% in the placebo group were discharged from the hospital during double-blind treatment period (P>.05). Cohen’s effect size was 0.85 (large effect). Significantly more subjects in the placebo group discontinued because of lack of efficacy (23.1% vs. 6.6% p <.001). ERC-CBZ group had significantly higher adverse events (91.8% vs. 56.4%). Conclusions: Overall, this was a well designed study. The validity criteria for appropriate question type were met, also the sample was big enough. However, the period of follow up was short, the participants seemed to be less sick than the usual manic population we handle, and because the study provides little information on study sites and recruitment it could be difficult to extrapolate results to our own patients. Monotherapy treatment with extended release carbamazepine was statistically significantly more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of manic or mixed episode in the first 21 days of treatment in this RCT. Although the treatment group had a significantly higher incidence of adverse events, this does not fully account for the drop outs in the treatment group, from which the authors conclude that the medication is safe and well tolerated. Two Teaching Points: 1. Intention to treat analysis, which is analysis of outcomes based on the treatment arm to which patients are randomized, preserves the value of randomization. Analyses restricted to patients who adhered to assigned treatment can provide misleading estimate of impact. 2. The intention to treat principle is violated by excluding patients who did not begin the treatment to which they were allocated. Two Questions for Discussion: 1. Why is carbamazepine less used if efficacy has been proven? 2. At what point would you consider carbamazepine monotherapy in your manic (or mixed episode) patients?
Author:Jane Gagliardi 10/30/00TEGRETOL AND MANIAPost et al. review carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA) and the newer anticonvulsants in the treatment of bipolar affective disorder. They have gathered information from a large number of trials in bipolar disorder and have included those trials in which the methods included some kind of controlled design. As part of the introduction, they note that lithium (Li) is thought of as the standard therapy, but that the largest controlled trial of Li in acute mania indicates only 50% of patients demonstrated 50% improvement after three weeks of therapy in the acute setting. Poor response to Li was associated with rapid cycling, negative family history, increasing number of episodes prior to initiation of Li therapy, and comorbid substance abuse. CBZ
in acute mania:
there were 19 controlled studies included in the paper, comprising 203 patients.
123 of the 203 patients with acute mania showed a marked to excellent
response to CBZ. (61% response rate
in acute mania). CBZ in prophylaxis: there were 14 “partly controlled” / controlled studies included in the analysis of prophylaxis. In these studies, 63% of patients given CBZ showed a moderate to excellent prophylactic response, which compared to 63% response to Li. In a trial comparing Li to CBZ in which patients were crossed over to the other treatment group after a year of therapy, 31% of the patients on Li and 37% of the patients on CBZ dropped out because of inadequate response to the medication.
Small et al. performed a longitudinal, prospective study of newly hospitalized patients with bipolar disorder, mixed or manic episodes. Patients were excluded if they had a history of other axis I disorders, significant medical problems, substance abuse or physical illness, or other contraindications to Li or CBZ. Dropout rate was high; by eight weeks, 2/3 of patients were excluded because of lack of efficacy or refusal to continue. Patients who were evaluated were assessed based on the GAS, MRS, BPRS, CGI, and SDMS-M subscale. Both Li and CBZ were found to be “modestly effective” in the short-term treatment of acute mania. In this study, 52 subjects were initially included. In the CBZ group, one had decreased granulocyte count and had to be dropped from the study. Rate of recurrent mania and depression were similar; rate of noncompliance was slightly higher in the lithium group. Overall, dropout rate was similar but dropouts occurred earlier in the CBZ group than in the Li group. Dilsaver et al. performed an evaluation of CBZ vs. chlorpromazine in the treatment of 36 inpatients with bipolar disorder (depressed). They found that CBZ treatment was about as effective as chlorpromazine in improving mood, sleep, headache, and mood fluctuations (there were some trends on physician global improvement scale favoring CBZ, but these were not significant). In this study, one patient had blurry vision and another had rash and fever as reasons for withdrawal from the CBZ group. Bottom Line: According to the data reviewed in these articles, CBZ appears to be about equally effective as Li in the treatment of acute mania and in prophylaxis of bipolar disorder. Depending on the patient and the potential tolerability of CBZ, it could be a viable option for the treatment of acute mania as well as for prophylaxis in bipolar disorder. Importantly, the authors of these articles take care to point out that response to one agent does NOT predict response to another, and it may be necessary to switch or add medications for adequate treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. References: Dilsaver SC; Swann SC; Chen y et al. Treatment of bipolar depression with carbamazepine: Results of an open study. Biological Psychiatry(1996) 40: 935-937. Small JC; Klapper MH; Milstein V et al. Carbamazepine compared with lithium in the treatment of mania. Archives of General Psychiatry (1991) 48: 915-921. Author:
|
|
VPA |
CBZ |
|
11.1% risk of malformation |
5.7% risk of malformation |
|
Neural tube defects 1-2% (lumbosacral) |
Neural tube defects 1% (lumbosacral) |
|
Fetal VPA syndrome—brachycephaly, high forehead, shallow orbits, ocular hypertelorism, small nose and muth, low-set, posteriorly rotated ears, long overlapping fingers and toes, hyperconvex fingernails (Eller et al) Epicanthic folds, infraorbital groove, medial deficiency of eyebrows, flat nasal bridge, short nose with anteverted nares, smooth/shallow philtrum, long thin upper lip, thick lower lip, small and downturned mouth (Moore et al) |
Cranial facial defects, fingernail hypoplasia, developmental delay (Eller et al) Epicanthic folds, short nose, long philtrum, upward slanting palpebral fissures, hypoplastic nails (Moore et al) |
|
Risk of hemorrhage b/c impaired vitamin K dependent clotting factors |
Risk of hemorrhage b/c impaired vitamin K dependent clotting factors |
|
Risk of acute liver failure in the infant |
Risk of transient neonatal hepatic dysfunction |
|
Risk of developmental delay and behavioral problems (Moore et al) |
|
References
Eller DP, Patterson CA, Webb GW.
Prescribing in pregnancy: Maternal and fetal implications of
anticonvulsive therapy during pregnancy.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Clinis 24(3): 523-532, September 1997.
Finn E, Joergensen A, Hoseth E, et al. Neonatal hypoglycemia and withdrawal symptoms after exposure in utero to valproate. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 83(2): F124-F129, September 2000.
Moore SJ, Turnpenny P, Quinn A, et al. A clinical study of 57 children with fetal anticonvulsant syndromes. Journal of Medical Genetics 37(7): 489-497, July 2000.
Finnerty M, Levin Z, Miller LJ. Acute manic episodes in pregnancy. American Journal of Psychiatry 153(2): 261-263, February 1996.
Author:
Chris Aiken, M.D.
Topiramate for Bipolar Disorders
Question:
What is the evidence that topiramte treats bipolar disorders?
Five open label, naturalistic case series’ of topiramate published:
|
Study |
Type /Dose (M=Mean) |
N |
M:F Age |
Subjects |
Wks |
Measure* |
Response |
|
McElroy |
adjunctive 50-500mg/d |
54
|
3:7 42y |
Outpatients, treatment refractory. Bipolar I (43), II (11), schizoaff (2). Divided by episode = manic (30), depressed (11), euthymic (13). |
4, 10, & last eval. (~30) |
Change in CGI, YMRS, or IDS |
Manic improved (YMRS 9.9 --> 5.3 --> 6.9, p 0.004). Depressives unchanged. Euthymics slightly more depressed (p 0.025). |
|
Marcotte |
adjunctive with a few monotherapy m 200mg/d |
58
|
3:5 45y |
Treatment refractory, inpatients (30%), outpatients (70%), bipolar (59%), cyclothym (17%) schizoaff (16%), numerous comorbidities. |
16 mean |
Qualitative: mood, sleep, appetite, con-centration. |
62% "marked/moderate improvement" |
|
Calabrese |
monotherapy m 614mg/d |
11 |
? |
Hospitalized, severe treatment refractory acute mania |
4 |
>50% YMRS |
27% improved |
|
Kusumaker |
adjunctive ? mg/d |
19 |
0:1 |
Out-patients, female, rapid cycling bipolar with psychotropic-induced wt gain. |
? |
? |
52% improved |
|
Chengappa |
adjunctive 1-300mg/d |
20 |
? |
Bipolar (18), schizoaff (2), manic episodes. |
12 |
>50% on YMRS & CGI |
60% improved |
References:
McElroy et al. Open-label adjunctive topiramate in the treatment of
bipolar disorders. Biol Psychiatry 47: 1025-33, 2000.
Marcotte D. Use of topiramate, a new antiepileptic as a mood stabilizer. J Affect Disorder 50: 245-51, 1998.
Calabrese et al. Topiramate in severe treatment-refractory mania.
Abstract, APA Toronto 6/1998.
Kusumaker et al. Topiramate in rapid cycling bipolar women. Abstract
APA-Washington DC, 1999.
Chengappa et al. Topiramate as add-on treatment for patients with
bipolar
mania. Bipolar Disorder 1: 42-53, 1999.
*Abbreviations:
CGI (clinical global impression for mania), YMRS (Young mania rating scale), IDS (Inventory of depressive symptoms).
McElroy, Specific Strengths :
• Reported improvements maintained on 2 standard rating scales at
3 measurements.
• Subjects separated by mood at baseline.
McElroy, Specific Weaknesses:
• High drop out rate (35% @10wk, 52% total); these results were
not counted except in the "last evaluation" category. Another
13% were not counted because additional psychotropics were added when
their mood worsened.
• Initial YMRS was relatively low (9.9). Subsets with higher YMRS were
also analyzed (similar results found).
Marcotte, Specific Strengths:
• None
Marcotte, Specific Weaknesses:
• Qualitative measures done in clinical, not research setting.
Bias/placebo-effect is evident in his statement that "majority of
responders showed improvement within 72 hours at dose of 50mg/d."
In comparison, McElroy found a "slow response" with similar
dosages.
• Chart review. Drop-outs not applicable (though 10% discontinued due
to SE).
• Subjects had high mix of conditions, which led to much categorizing
(data-fishing) with unimpressive results.
Generalizations:
• Five case series were found for topiramte in bipolar disorders,
all except one were for adjunctive therapy.
• Of the two larger studies, one had severe methodologic limitations (Marcotte);
the other (McElroy) more rigorous study showed good results for mania
but was limited by a high drop out rate.
• No studies could control for clinician/patient bias, placebo effect,
natural course of illness, and effect of other drugs.
• Most studies used refractory patients
• No studies had clean exclusion/inclusion criteria.
Source:
American Journal of Psychiatry 149:7, July 1992
Authors: Robert Young, M.D. and Gerald Klerman, M.D.
Category: Review
Summary: The authors review diagnosis and classification of Bipolar disorder including incidence and prevalence of mania in the elderly. This paper emphasizes the limited number of systematic studies available, however they do explore the existing literature and discuss several aspects of psychopathology and how each relates to age and age-onset. Included in there analysis of Bipolar disorder are manic affective features, dysphoria and mixed states, delusions/psychotic features, and cognitive dysfunction. This paper focuses on late-onset bipolar noting trends and/or studies that are appropriate to this target group.
Diagnosis/classification/prevalence/incidence:
Types of bipolar include
Incidence: Limited data. Conflicting reports. Both sexes show the association with age was weaker for mania than for depression.
Etiology: Probands with late onset bipolar disorder have a lower rate of affective disorder among their relatives than do probands with early onset. Drugs of abuse have been associated with cases of mania in which age of onset is greater than 40 years. Manic patients aged greater than or equal to 60 with onset of first manic episode after age 58 had antidepressant pharmicotherapy associated with their index episode more often than elderly manic patients with onset at an earlier age. Manic symptoms can occur with cerebrovascular disease, as well as other focal brain lesions. Right-side lesions have been particularly implicated in the pathogenesis of mania.
Reference:
Videbech P, Gouliaev G, First
admission with puerperal psychosis: 4-14 years of follow-up
Methods:
Design:
Retrospective Cohort study
Setting:
The study took place in Denmark
where women were admitted to psychiatric hospitals for the first time
with postpartum psychosis were identified by using the national personal
identification number to link data from the Danish Psychiatric Central
Register with the Danish Medical Birth register.
Inclusion
Criteria:
first admission to a psychiatric department in the years 1973
to 1980;
admission within 12 months
after a parturition;
diagnosis at discharge was psychosis (ICD-8 290 to
299)
and all admissions
took place at the psychiatric departments in Arhus County, Arhus
psychiatric hospital or the psychiatric
wards in the cities of Silkeborg or Randers with a well-defined
catchment of approximately 600,000 inhabitants.
Control
Group: every proband had two
controls with inclusion criteria of 1) they delivered at the same
maternity ward in the same year and 2) they had same parity and
approximately the same age.
Outcomes:
Primary: Evaluate women who had
first time diagnoses and admissions to psychiatric hospitals following
delivery of the first child and compare certain demographical variables
with those of the background
population and to investigate whether obstetrical factors could
contribute to the development of the disorder.
Description
of Prognosis factors considered: Mental disorder, hospitalizations,
medications and social functioning.
Validity
Was
the patient sample clearly defined, representative of clinical
practice, and captured in a similar point
in disease progression? Yes
Was
the duration of follow-up sufficient? Yes. Were all patients
accounted for? Yes
Were
outcome criteria objective and unbiased relative to prognostic
factors? Yes
Was
their adjustment for linked prognostic factors? No
Were
pts in study treated similarly? Yes
Ds
the study population describe my patient? Yes, somewhat
Results