Home
Clinical
Research
Education
Grand Rounds
Faculty

Informatics

Links

 

 

 

  QUEST - Mood

 

AUTHOR:
Dinesh Benjamin

Quetiapine monotherapy  for depression in bipolar disorder I and II

Chairman’s Rounds, May 19, 2008

Citation: Thase et al Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology Dec 2006 

Clinical question: Is Quetiapine monotherapy effective for depression in bipolar disorder I and II? 

Question type: Therapy

-Follow up was complete (Figure 1 pg 603)

-Randomization yes, concealed centralized

-Intention to treat Pts were analyzed in the groups in which they were randomized

-Similar all groups appear similar (Table 1 pg 603)

-Blinding Yes, Patients and clinicians blinded.

-Equal treatment: All groups appeared to have been treated equally except for the intervention

Study design: Multi-center Randomized control trial  

Method

-Patients underwent a washout period of 7-28 days and then randomized to 8 weeks of placebo, 300mg or 600mg Quetiapine. Patient were also stratified by Bipolar Type I and II in a 2:1 ratio in the 3 arms

-Inclusion criteria: Pts 18-65 yrs who met criteria for Bipolar (SCID interview) and were having a depressive episode (HAM-D score>20, YMRS <=12)

-Exclusion criteria: Diagnosis of Axis I other than Bipolar that was the primary focus of treatment in the last 6 months, episode of depression lasting >12months/ <4 weeks, h/o no response to >2 trials of antidepressants, substance abuse, medical illness or significant suicide or homicide risk.

-Allowed Lorazepam or Zolpidem for the 1st 3 weeks

Duration- 8 weeks

Setting Multi center 41

Primary outcomes- MADRS score, proportion who received response and proportion who received remission (Also CGI, HAM-D, HAM-A, SDS, Q-LES-Q) 

Analysis: The primary analysis was change from baseline MADRS to final assessment. They used ANCOVA. Sample sizes were determined to provide 85% power to detect a difference of 3.6 points in the MADRS 

Results

1)       Quetiapine a 300mg or 600mg demonstrate significantly greater mean improvement as early as week 1. (Mean change -11.93,16.94 and -16.00 in Placebo, 300mg  ES 0.61and 600mg ES 0.54) see Table 2 pg 604

2)       Response rates significantly higher in week 2 and significant remission rates by week 2 for 300mg and week 3 for 600mg and significant week 8 remission. (Fig 2 pg 605).

3)       The anti-depressant effects were not at the expense of treatment-emergent affective switches

Limitations

1) High rates of attrition

2) High placebo response

3) No information for doses other than 300mg and 600mg

4) Exclusion of suicidal patients

5) No powered to detect differences in bipolar subtypes

Conclusions: The study did show a significant effect of improvement in depressive symptoms with Quetiapine when compared to placebo. It may have been helpful to exclude placebo responders before the RCT given the rate of response to placebo. Although the authors attempted to analyze differences between sub-groups (Type I and II and rapid cycling the study was not really powered to do so.

Synopsis: The study has a strong level of evidence that Quetiapine maybe useful in treating depression in bipolar disorder. It does not assess efficacy in suicidal patients or in comparison to Lithium or other first line agents. 

Return to top of the page



AUTHOR

Johnny Lee

 

Risk of Switch in Mood Polarity to Hypomania or Mania in Patients with Bipolar Depression

 

      Chairman’s Rounds, March 26, 2007

 

Reference: Leverich et al. Risk of Switch in Mood Polarity to Hypomania or Mania in Patients with Bipolar Depression During Acute and Continuation Trials of Venlafaxine, Sertraline, and Buproprion as Adjuncts to Mood Stabilizers. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 232-239.

 

Clinical Question on Harm: Does the use of antidepressants with mood stabilizers increase the risk of switching to hypomania or mania?

 

Background Info: There is controversy as to the response rate to antidepressants and risk of switch into hypomania or mania when these agents used in adjunct to mood stabilizers.   

 

Harm/Risk: Showed similarity in possible determinants of outcome. Each type of antidepressant analyzed separately. Groups were not treated similarly WRT mood stabilizer(s) but threshold switching reported to be unrelated. Outcomes measured in the same way in the groups being compared. Follow-up weekly for first 2 wks, then at least biweekly during 10-wk phase, and at least monthly during continuation phase with PRN visits. Reasonable temporal relationship between exposure and outcome. Unclear dose-response gradient.

 

Randomized Controlled Trials

Blinding: Outcome measures were blindly assessed by clinicians.

Duration: 10-week acute treatment phase followed by continuation study for up to 1 year.

Setting: Patients from Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network

Patients/Population: Total N = 159 of 184 included bec/ had life chart: 115 (72.3%) BP I patients, 40 (25.2%) w/ rapid cycling. 52.2% Male. 87 patients with response to antidepressant entered continuation treatment for up to 1 year. 

Intervention/drug exposure: Patients with BP depression receiving at least 1 mood stabilizer at clinically therapeutic levels were randomly assigned to buproprion, sertraline, and venlafaxine. If pt did not respond  acutely to initial antidepressant, they were offered blind re-randomization 1 of the other 2 drugs.

Outcome measures: Monitor antidepressant response with the Clinical Global Impression BP Version (CGI-BP). Occurrence of sub-threshold brief mania (emergence of brief hypomania as least 1 but <7 days or recurrent brief hypomania) or threshold switches (emergence of full duration hypomania or mania) were blindly assessed by clinician-rated daily reports of continuum mood-associated dysfunction on the NIMH Life Chart Method.

 

Main Results: 111 (48.7%) of 228 acute antidepressant trials a/w rating of much improved/very much improved on CGI-BP. 11.4% hypomania and 7.9% mania threshold switches occurred in acute treatment trials; 21.8% hypomania and 14.9% mania, respectively, in the continuation trials. Rate of threshold switches was higher in the 169 trials in BP I patients (30.8%) than 59 trials with BP II patients (18.6%). Ratio of threshold switches to subthreshold brief hypomania was higher in both acute (3.60) and continuation trials (3.75) of venlafaxine than in the trials of buproprion (ratios 0.85, 1.17), sertraline (1.67, 1.66). Only 23.3% of patients (37 of 228 acute antidepressant trials) had sustained antidepressant response in continuation phase without threshold switch.

 

Conclusions: In patients with bipolar depression, I would take caution in prescribing an adjunctive antidepressant to mood stabilizer as there is increased risk in switching to hypomania or mania. This study used a scale to rate a continuum of mood rather than a single-threshold or dichotomous measures. However, patients could be on different types of mood stabilizers that were held constant.

 

Synopsis: Adjunctive treatment with antidepressants in BP depression was a/w increased risks of threshold switches to full-duration hypomania or mania in both acute and continuation trials. Highest relative risk of such switching: Venlafaxine > Sertraline > Buproprion

Return to top of the page


AUTHOR
Victoria Carroll 

Tranylcypromine Versus Venlafaxine Plus Mirtazapine Following Three Failed Antidepressant Medication Trials for Depression 

Chairman’s Rounds, March 26, 2007 

Reference: McGrath, PJ et al.  Tranylcypromine Versus Venlafaxine Plus Mirtazapine Following Three Failed Antidepressant Medication Trials for Depression: A STAR*D Report.  AJP September 2006; 163(9): 1531-41. 

 Clinical Question: In terms of efficacy and tolerability, how does tranylcypromine compare to the combination of venlafaxine and mirtazapine in patients with MDD whose current depressive episode was refractory to 3 prior medication trials?

Background: There is limited research on depressive episodes refractory to multiple medication trials.  ECT has been regarded as the gold standard for tx-refractory depression, but this is an imperfect option for many.  MAOI’s have been considered alternatives to ECT in this population.  Two open-label trials have reported improved efficacy with tranylcypromine at higher doses than the FDA-approved maximum (60 mg/day).  There is additionally thought that a combination of antidepressants with different methods of action may have a synergistic effect. 

Question Type: Therapy

Validity Criteria: Complete follow-up? All subjects were accounted for.  Intention to treat: Subjects were analyzed in the groups they were randomized to; pts with missing exit data were assumed not to have achieved remission.  Similar groups?  Please see Table 1, p. 1534.  There were statistically significant differences b/t groups in # of subjects who dropped out of step 3 2/2 intolerance and the # of subjects who received mirtazapine in step 3.  Blinding?  This was an open-label study (tx was not masked to subjects or clinicians); assignment was masked to HAM-D administrators.  Equal treatment?  Yes, but more pts in the tranylcypromine were in tx < 4 weeks.

Study Design: Randomized, open label trial.

Duration: 12 week study

Setting: 18 primary care and 21 psychiatric settings

Population: 4,041 outpatients from 18-75 y.o. with MDD were initially enrolled in STAR*D.  109 subjects who did not experience remission with or were unable to tolerate 3 preceding medication trials were enrolled in this study. 

Intervention: Subjects were randomized to receive either tranylcypromine (T; n=58) or venlafaxine + mirtazapine (V+M; n=51).  Subjects in the V+M group were started on venlafaxine 37.5 mg qd and mirtazapine 15 mg qd; subjects in the T group underwent a 2-week washout pd before being started on 10 mg qd.  Dosing protocols were recommended for both groups. 

Outcomes: The primary outcome measure was whether subjects experienced remission, defined as HAM-D < 7 at exit from tx.  The secondary outcome measure was whether subjects experienced remission (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology—Self-Report (QIDS-SR) < 5) or response (reduction  of > 50% from baseline QIDS-SR score) at each clinic visit.  Side effects were assessed at each visit through subject self-report.   

Results: See Table 3.

--Differences in percentages of subjects achieving remission on HAM-D or QIDS-SR and response on QIDS-SR were not statistically significant:

            --HAM-D Remission: 6.9% in T group vs. 13.7% in V+M group

            --QIDS-SR Remission: 13.8% in T group vs. 15.7% in V+M group

            --QIDS-SR Response: 12.1% in T group vs. 23.5% in V+M group

--Difference in percentage reduction on QIDS-SR was statistically significant b/t groups (-6.2% in T group vs. –25.0% in V+M group)

--Differences in time to remission or time to response were not statistically significant b/t groups

--Burden, frequency, and intensity of side effects did not differ b/t groups.  41.4% of T group vs. 21.6% of V+M group exited the study 2/2 inability to tolerate tx (p<0.03; RR 1.92).

 

Risk of HAM-D Remission

RR of HAM-D Remission

Risk of QIDS-SR Remission

RR of QIDS-SR Remission

Risk of QIDS-SR Response

RR of QIDS-SR Response

Ven. + Mirt.

7/51 = 0.137

.137/.069=1.99

8/51 = 0.157

.157/.138=1.14

12/51 = 0.235

.235/.121=1.94

Tranylcypro.

4/58 = 0.069

 

8/58 = 0.138

 

7/58 = 0.121

 

 

Comments: This 12-week study found no differences between groups of pts with tx-refractory MDD treated with tranylcypromine or venlafaxine + mirtazapine in rates of remission (HAM-D < 7 or QIDS-SR < 5) or response (>50% reduction from baseline QIDS-SR score).  A significantly larger proportion of subjects treated with tranylcypromine dropped out of the study 2/2 inability to tolerate tx.  Strengths: study directly compares two interventions; important study given relative paucity of research data in populations with tx-refractory depression.  Weaknesses: open-label design; between group differences at baseline could potentially effect results (e.g. larger proportion of pts in V+M group were treated with mirtazapine in step 3); amount of time in tx was different between groups (larger proportion of subjects in T group were in tx < 4 weeks, including 2 week washout period)—did this bias results to show less improvement from baseline?; mean dose of tranylcypromine (36.9 mg/day) did not approach higher doses (70-120 mg/day) shown to be more effective. 

Bottom Line: In a 12-week randomized, open-label trial of 109 subjects with MDD, who did not experience remission or were unable to tolerate 3 preceding medications trials, treated with tranylcypromine or venlafaxine+mirtazapine, there were no differences between groups in rates of remission (HAM-D < 7 or QIDS-SR < 5) or response (>50% reduction from baseline QIDS-SR score).   The proportion of subjects treated with tranylcypromine who withdrew from the study 2/2 tx intolerability was significantly higher than that of the venlafaxine+mirtazapine group.

Return to top of the page


AUTHOR:
Carolina Aponte Urdaneta

Carbamazepine Capsules as Monotherapy for Acute Mania in Bipolar Disorder

 Chairman’s Rounds, September 9, 2006

Citation: Weisler, RH et al. ‘Extended-Release Carbamazepine Capsules as Monotherapy for Acute Mania in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial’. J Clin Psychiatry 2005; 66:323-330.

Clinical Question: What is the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with extended-release carbamazepine in patients with bipolar I disorder experiencing manic or mixed episodes?

Background Info: Carbamazepine has been long used in the treatment of bipolar disorder, however its efficacy was proven only recently in a well conducted study. Due to the limitations in response and tolerability of the available agents to treat bipolar disorder, the availability of additional options is likely to improve outcomes.

Question Type: Therapy

Validity Criteria for Appropriate Question Type:

Follow-up: 144 patients (60.3%) completed the study. All but 4 patients who entered the trial were properly accounted for and attributed at its conclusion. Randomization: Randomized. Intention to treat: from the 239 patients, 235 were included in the intention to treat sample. Similar groups: There were no important differences between groups. Blinding: Double blinded. Equal treatment: There was equal treatment aside from the intervention. Non intervention treatment: Lorazepam prn was the only additional medication allowed.

Study Design Type: Randomized Controlled Trial

Relevant Criteria for Appropriate Design:

Allocation: Randomized (no comments on how randomization was achieved).

Blinding: Double blind (no comments on how blinding was achieved).

Follow up period:  21 days, following a 5 day single-blind placebo lead in period.

Setting: 25 study sites (19 US and 6 in India). There is no comment on what kind of study sites these were - university, community, public, or private.

Patients/Population: n= 239. >18 y/o. DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder most current episode manic or mixed, with a prior manic or mixed episode, with YMRS score of > 20. Information was not given on how these patients were recruited.

Intervention/ exposure: Extended Release Carbamazepine (beaded capsules) up to 1600 mg daily (started at 200 mg and titrated by 200 mg daily).

Outcomes: Primary outcome was change in YMRS total score. Secondary outcomes included: responder rate (defined as decrease> 50% in YMRS score), change in CGI and HAM-D scores and time to outpatient status.

Patient Follow Up: 144 completed the study. 95 terminated prematurely: 4 lost to follow up, 17 adverse effects, 35 lack of efficacy, 13 protocol violations, 4 other.

Main Results:  Primary outcome: Treatment group with statistically significant decreases in YMRS scores at day 7, 14 and 21 compared to placebo (Last observation carried forward analysis in ITT sample p <.0001 at all points) Figure 1. Secondary outcomes: ERC-CBZ patients had significantly higher response rates on all measured days (p<0.0001), with by my calculations a relative risk of 2.1 at the end point. CGI-S and CGI-I scales scores were significantly improved in the treatment group (p<.0001), as were HAM-D scores (p<.01). 48.3% in ERC-CBZ group vs. 34.8% in the placebo group were discharged from the hospital during double-blind treatment period (P>.05). Cohen’s effect size was 0.85 (large effect). Significantly more subjects in the placebo group discontinued because of lack of efficacy (23.1% vs. 6.6% p <.001). ERC-CBZ group had significantly higher adverse events (91.8% vs. 56.4%).

Conclusions: Overall, this was a well designed study. The validity criteria for appropriate question type were met, also the sample was big enough. However, the period of follow up was short, the participants seemed to be less sick than the usual manic population we handle, and because the study provides little information on study sites and recruitment it could be difficult to extrapolate results to our own patients. Monotherapy treatment with extended release carbamazepine was statistically significantly more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of manic or mixed episode in the first 21 days of treatment  in this RCT. Although the treatment group had a significantly higher incidence of adverse events, this does not fully account for the drop outs in the treatment group, from which the authors conclude that the medication is safe and well tolerated.

Two Teaching Points: 

1. Intention to treat analysis, which is analysis of outcomes based on the treatment arm to which patients are randomized, preserves the value of randomization. Analyses restricted to patients who adhered to assigned treatment can provide misleading estimate of impact.

2. The intention to treat principle is violated by excluding patients who did not begin the treatment to which they were allocated.

Two Questions for Discussion: 1. Why is carbamazepine less used if efficacy has been proven? 2. At what point would you consider carbamazepine monotherapy in your manic (or mixed episode) patients?

 

 

Return to top of the page


Author:

Jane Gagliardi 10/30/00

TEGRETOL AND MANIA

Post et al. review carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA) and the newer anticonvulsants in the treatment of bipolar affective disorder.  They have gathered information from a large number of trials in bipolar disorder and have included those trials in which the methods included some kind of controlled design.  As part of the introduction, they note that lithium (Li) is thought of as the standard therapy, but that the largest controlled trial of Li in acute mania indicates only 50% of patients demonstrated 50% improvement after three weeks of therapy in the acute setting.  Poor response to Li was associated with rapid cycling, negative family history, increasing number of episodes prior to initiation of Li therapy, and comorbid substance abuse.

CBZ in acute mania: there were 19 controlled studies included in the paper, comprising 203 patients.  123 of the 203 patients with acute mania showed a marked to excellent response to CBZ.  (61% response rate in acute mania). 
CBZ in acute depression: there were fewer studies; the authors included one of their own pilot studies and said that only 17 of 57 acutely depressed patients (30%) had a moderate to marked effect with CBZ monotherapy.  In uncontrolled studies, there was a reported 73% treatment effect.

CBZ in prophylaxis: there were 14 “partly controlled” / controlled studies included in the analysis of prophylaxis.  In these studies, 63% of patients given CBZ showed a moderate to excellent prophylactic response, which compared to 63% response to Li.  In a trial comparing Li to CBZ in which patients were crossed over to the other treatment group after a year of therapy, 31% of the patients on Li and 37% of the patients on CBZ dropped out because of inadequate response to the medication.

  • Additional observations about CBZ:
    -No real target blood reference range identified across subjects; there does seem to be some relevance of blood levels for individual patients

  • -Theory that activity in the mesial temporal structures (preliminary PET data) may predict response to CBZ

  • -Rapid cycling seems to be a poor prognostic factor for CBZ as well as for Li therapy

  • -Patients with negative family history may respond better to CBZ

  • -Mechanism of action: 1996 demonstration of CBZ blocking the Ca influx through NMDA receptors

  • -Cytochrome P450 3A4 inducer; decreases its own levels as well as those of OCP’s

  • -Potential adverse effect of agranulocytosis

Small et al. performed a longitudinal, prospective study of newly hospitalized patients with bipolar disorder, mixed or manic episodes.  Patients were excluded if they had a history of other axis I disorders, significant medical problems, substance abuse or physical illness, or other contraindications to Li or CBZ.  Dropout rate was high; by eight weeks, 2/3 of patients were excluded because of lack of efficacy or refusal to continue.  Patients who were evaluated were assessed based on the GAS, MRS, BPRS, CGI, and SDMS-M subscale.  Both Li and CBZ were found to be “modestly effective” in the short-term treatment of acute mania.  In this study, 52 subjects were initially included.  In the CBZ group, one had decreased granulocyte count and had to be dropped from the study. Rate of recurrent mania and depression were similar; rate of noncompliance was slightly higher in the lithium group.  Overall, dropout rate was similar but dropouts occurred earlier in the CBZ group than in the Li group.

Dilsaver et al. performed an evaluation of CBZ vs. chlorpromazine in the treatment of 36 inpatients with bipolar disorder (depressed).  They found that CBZ treatment was about as effective as chlorpromazine in improving mood, sleep, headache, and mood fluctuations (there were some trends on physician global improvement scale favoring CBZ, but these were not significant).  In this study, one patient had blurry vision and another had rash and fever as reasons for withdrawal from the CBZ group.

Bottom Line: According to the data reviewed in these articles, CBZ appears to be about equally effective as Li in the treatment of acute mania and in prophylaxis of bipolar disorder.  Depending on the patient and the potential tolerability of CBZ, it could be a viable option for the treatment of acute mania as well as for prophylaxis in bipolar disorder.  Importantly, the authors of these articles take care to point out that response to one agent does NOT predict response to another, and it may be necessary to switch or add medications for adequate treatment of patients with bipolar disorder.

References:
Post RM; Ketter TA; Denicoff K et al. The place of anticonvulsant therapy in bipolar illness.  Psychopharmacology(1996) 128: 115-129.

Dilsaver SC; Swann SC; Chen y et al. Treatment of bipolar depression with carbamazepine: Results of an open  study.  Biological Psychiatry(1996) 40: 935-937.

Small JC; Klapper MH; Milstein V et al. Carbamazepine compared with lithium in the treatment of mania.  Archives of General Psychiatry (1991) 48: 915-921.

Return to top of the page


Author:
Jane Gagliardi - Chairman's Rounds 11/27/00 

TREATING PATIENTS WITH BIPOLAR DISORDER IN PREGNANCY

Question: what are the issues in treating patients with bipolar disorder in pregnancy?  Specifically, what are the risks involved in continuing mood stabilization with Depakote or Tegretol during pregnancy?

Finnerty et al (1996) report on a woman who was hospitalized at 26 weeks of pregnancy, 4 weeks after she and her psychiatrist decided in the outpatient setting to d/c her Depakote because she informed him that she was 5 months pregnant.  The patient immediately de compensated, becoming hostile at home and ceasing to control her diabetes.  She was admitted to the hospital for stabilization and was tried on haldol and benzodiazepines, which even at high doses (40 haldol, 14 ativan) was not effective.  She eventually underwent ECT; however, at 29th week of pregnancy, on ECT, she experienced premature rupture of the membranes and required C section.  Post-partum, she deteriorated and required psychiatric hospitalization and stabilization—tried on VPA, ativan and haldol, finally required ECT.

The article brings up a number of interesting issues about the problems inherent in bipolar disorder and pregnancy: 

Patients need to be informed of the risk of possible problems in pregnancy in the presence of mood stabilizing medications; 

A manic patient is not exercising good judgment and is more likely to have an unplanned pregnancy; 

The same patient is also likely not to receive good prenatal care; 

Medical illness in the same patient will not be well controlled, which can cause problems for the developing fetus (e.g., diabetes); 

Most exposure to medications/drugs happens early in the pregnancy, before the physician is aware of pregnancy; 

Bioavailability of medications during pregnancy is altered and drug levels may be irrelevant due to different ratios of protein binding and altered distribution; 

The post-partum period is a high-risk period for relapse into depression or mania;

ECT is thought by psychiatrists to be safe in pregnancy, although there are some reports of premature rupture of the membranes in ECT which are questionably attributable to ECT; 

The legalities of committing a woman based solely on the potential for harm to her fetus are questionable (most states do not allow commitment for this reason).

Eller et al. (1997) examined the implications of anticonvulsant therapy during pregnancy by conducting a review of the literature available through ~1996.  Since the 1980’s, there have been reports in the literature about specific patterns of malformations in children born to women receiving depakote (VPA) and tegretol (CBZ).

Notably, all the women studied in the literature for these data have taken these medications for the treatment of seizure disorder, in which there is a recognized increased risk of birth defects in uncontrolled seizure disorder; there is also the question of whether or not any of these abnormalities were inherited rather than acquired because of the medications.

Recommendations have been to treat women who take VPA or CBZ as if they have had children with neural tube defects in the past—e.g., folic acid 4 mg PO qD (usual prenatal dose 400 mcg).  There is some possibility, however, that this dose of folic acid might induce CP450 enzymes and alter metabolism of the medications, requiring close monitoring.  Further, there is no good evidence that this intervention would work (it is extrapolated from other, widely known data about the efficacy of folic acid in preventing neural tube defects).  There are a number of theories about why VPA and CBZ are associated with neural tube defects, which seem to boil down to glutathione and SAM metabolism (animal studies).

There are also recommendations that women taking VPA or CBZ should take vitamin K 10 mg PO qD for the last 1-2 months of pregnancy, and the infant should receive a 1 mg injection of vitamin K at birth in order to address the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

Finn et al. (2000) conducted a prospective study of neonates born to mothers who had been taking valproic acid with the goal of determining the incidence of withdrawal symptoms and hypoglycemia.

Objective: To define the risk of hypoglycemia in term infants exposed to valproic acid, and to describe the withdrawal symptoms.

Design: Prospective study in Denmark on a case-control basis.

Cases: 22 infants selected from 24,500 infants born in the North Jutland County in Denmark between 7/93 and 2/97 whose mothers were taking valproate during pregnancy.  Exclusion criteria were preterm (<37 weeks), or the second twin.  19 of the mothers had primary generalized epilepsy, and three had complex partial epilepsy.  20 were taking VPA alone and 2 were taking VPA + CBZ.

Controls: 233 infants born at term to mothers not taking VPA or having epilepsy during the same time period provided one blood sample each (at either 1,2,4,6,12,24,48,72 or 96 hours post-partum) for glucose measurements; 22 additional infants from this hospital (term, normal pregnancies, no epilepsy in mothers) had their cord blood analyzed for glucose, insulin, proinsulin and C peptide.  

Method: Women with epilepsy taking VPA were seen monthly by a neurologist during pregnancy and had blood levels of VPA monitored.  All patients had U/S; 11 had amniocentesis, and one had a chorionic villus biopsy.  The women either abstained from EtOH or drank small amounts.  

Glucose was measured at birth (cord blood), then at 1,2,4,6,12,18,24 hours 

and then every 8 hours till the 5th day of life. 

Insulin, proinsulin, and C peptide were determined, as well as LFT’s.  

The infant’s VPA level was determined at days 2 and 4 of life.

Infants were observed with q8-hourly records of withdrawal symptoms

                 (irritability, jitteriness, hypertonia, seizures, and vomiting).

Measures: Hypoglycemia was defined as <1.8mMol/L (32 mg/dL) based on previous studies by this same group.

Results: 14 boys, 8 girls.  13 of 22 infants in the case group had episodes of hypoglycemia.  7 occurred at 1 hour, 3 occurred at 2 hours, 1 occurred at 4 hours, one at 12 hours, and one at 67 hours.  All infants developing hypoglycemia were placed on glucose drips and all were asymptomatic.  One infant had 8 episodes; one had three, two had two, and nine had one episode of hypoglycemia.  At one hour, the case infants had significantly lower average glucose (2.1) than the control infants (2.9), p<0.01.  At two hours, there was a trend (p=0.06).  A logistical regression showed that the mother’s VPA level in the third trimester was significantly and inversely correlated with infants’ plasma glucose concentrations (p<0.01).

                10 of 22 infants in the case group demonstrated w/d symptoms beginning at 12-24 hours and lasting until 2-7 days.  There was one infant who had a seizure.  One infant had an elevated AST, but had also suffered asphyxia; the rest of them had normal LFT’s.  A proportion of the infants required formula supplementation of breast mild because of w/d symptoms.

                There were no major malformations among the case infants; four infants did have minor abnormalities, including one infant who met criteria for fetal VPA syndrome.

Moore et al. (2000) reviewed 57 children with fetal anticonvulsant syndromes (mostly VPA) in order to further understand the clinical and behavioral phenotype of fetal anticonvulsant syndromes. 
Cases: 52 children located through a parents’ support group (National Fetal Anticonvulsant Syndrome Association) and 5 others found in a clinic.

Method: Retrospective analysis via medical and family history questionnaire at a clinic.

Measures: Questionnaire; karyotypes (51 cases); DNA testing for Fragile X (48 cases); review of photos by two experts who rated the children on whether or not they had FACS; ophthalmologic exams (46 cases)

Results: 46 of the 59 mothers were taking VPA (34 VPA alone, 12 in combination); 4 were taking CBZ, 4 were taking phenytoin.  There were 15 women taking more than one medication.

                11 (19%) had experienced neonatal w/d—4 required NGT, 3 were floppy, 6 were jittery, 2 had seizures (and one of these were found to be hypoglycemic in nature).

                No cleft palates were reported.

                Myopia (16/46), astigmatism (11/46) and strabismus (8/46) were prevalent in this group of children.

                44 (77%) had developmental delays or learning difficulties; 28 of 38 school-aged children (74%) were in special schools or receiving special education in mainstream schools.  10 of 38 school aged children (26%) were in normal mainstream education; three of these were in their first year.  41 of 53 children older than 2 (77%) needed to have speech therapy.  32 of the children (56%) had gross motor delays (13 severe enough to require OT).  

                46 (81%) had aberrant behavior; a formal diagnosis of behavior d/o was made in 9 (16%) cases.  22 (39%) were rated as hyperactive; 4 as autistic; 2 as having Asperger’s syndrome.  Only four children had neither developmental delays nor behavior problems.

Disadvantages: Selection bias!  The children included were those whose parents had sought a support group for their abnormalities.  Retrospective.  Self-report (questionnaires).  Possibility that the children’s anomalies were inherited but, because of maternal anticonvulsant use, were being attributed to the medications.

Summary of the findings about the risk of VPA and CBZ in pregnancy from the four references below.

VPA

CBZ

11.1% risk of malformation

5.7% risk of malformation

Neural tube defects 1-2% (lumbosacral)

Neural tube defects 1% (lumbosacral)

Fetal VPA syndrome—brachycephaly, high forehead, shallow orbits, ocular hypertelorism, small nose and muth, low-set, posteriorly rotated ears, long overlapping fingers and toes, hyperconvex fingernails (Eller et al)

Epicanthic folds, infraorbital groove, medial deficiency of eyebrows, flat nasal bridge, short nose with anteverted nares, smooth/shallow philtrum, long thin upper lip, thick lower lip, small and downturned mouth (Moore et al)

Cranial facial defects, fingernail hypoplasia, developmental delay (Eller et al)

Epicanthic folds, short nose, long philtrum, upward slanting palpebral fissures, hypoplastic nails (Moore et al)

Risk of hemorrhage b/c impaired vitamin K dependent clotting factors

Risk of hemorrhage b/c impaired vitamin K dependent clotting factors

Risk of acute liver failure in the infant

 Risk of transient neonatal hepatic dysfunction

Risk of developmental delay and behavioral problems (Moore et al)

 

References
Eller DP, Patterson CA, Webb GW.  Prescribing in pregnancy: Maternal and fetal implications of anticonvulsive therapy during pregnancy.  Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinis 24(3): 523-532, September 1997.

Finn E, Joergensen A, Hoseth E, et al.  Neonatal hypoglycemia and withdrawal symptoms after exposure in utero to valproate.  Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 83(2): F124-F129, September 2000.

Moore SJ, Turnpenny P, Quinn A, et al.  A clinical study of 57 children with fetal anticonvulsant syndromes.  Journal of Medical Genetics 37(7): 489-497, July 2000.

Finnerty M, Levin Z, Miller LJ.  Acute manic episodes in pregnancy.  American Journal of Psychiatry 153(2): 261-263, February 1996.

Return to top of the page


Author:
Chris Aiken, M.D.

Topiramate for Bipolar Disorders

Question:
 What is the evidence that topiramte treats bipolar disorders?

Five open label, naturalistic case series’ of topiramate published:

Study

Type /Dose (M=Mean)

N

M:F Age

Subjects

Wks

Measure*

Response

McElroy

adjunctive

50-500mg/d

54

 

3:7

42y

Outpatients, treatment refractory. Bipolar I (43), II (11), schizoaff (2). Divided by episode = manic (30), depressed (11), euthymic (13).

4, 10, & last eval. (~30)

Change in CGI, YMRS, or IDS

Manic improved (YMRS 9.9 --> 5.3 --> 6.9, p 0.004). Depressives unchanged. Euthymics slightly more depressed

(p 0.025).

Marcotte

adjunctive with a few monotherapy

m 200mg/d

58

 

3:5

45y

Treatment refractory, inpatients (30%), outpatients (70%), bipolar (59%), cyclothym (17%) schizoaff (16%), numerous comorbidities.

16 mean

Qualitative: mood, sleep, appetite, con-centration.

62% "marked/moderate improvement"

Calabrese

monotherapy

m 614mg/d

11

?

Hospitalized, severe treatment refractory acute mania

4

>50% YMRS

27% improved

Kusumaker

adjunctive

? mg/d

19

0:1

Out-patients, female, rapid cycling bipolar with psychotropic-induced wt gain.

?

?

52% improved

Chengappa

adjunctive

1-300mg/d

20

?

Bipolar (18), schizoaff (2), manic episodes.

12

>50% on YMRS & CGI

60% improved

References:
McElroy et al. Open-label adjunctive topiramate in the treatment of bipolar disorders. Biol Psychiatry 47: 1025-33, 2000.

Marcotte D. Use of topiramate, a new antiepileptic as a mood stabilizer. J Affect Disorder 50: 245-51, 1998.

Calabrese et al. Topiramate in severe treatment-refractory mania.
Abstract, APA Toronto 6/1998.

Kusumaker et al. Topiramate in rapid cycling bipolar women. Abstract
APA-Washington DC, 1999.

Chengappa et al. Topiramate as add-on treatment for patients with bipolar
mania. Bipolar Disorder 1: 42-53, 1999.

*Abbreviations:

CGI (clinical global impression for mania), YMRS (Young mania rating scale), IDS (Inventory of depressive symptoms).

McElroy, Specific Strengths :
• Reported improvements maintained on 2 standard rating scales at 3 measurements.
• Subjects separated by mood at baseline.

McElroy, Specific Weaknesses:
• High drop out rate (35% @10wk, 52% total); these results were not counted except in the "last evaluation" category. Another 13% were not counted because additional psychotropics were added when their mood worsened.
• Initial YMRS was relatively low (9.9). Subsets with higher YMRS were also analyzed (similar results found).

Marcotte, Specific Strengths:
• None

Marcotte, Specific Weaknesses:
• Qualitative measures done in clinical, not research setting. Bias/placebo-effect is evident in his statement that "majority of responders showed improvement within 72 hours at dose of 50mg/d." In comparison, McElroy found a "slow response" with similar dosages.
• Chart review. Drop-outs not applicable (though 10% discontinued due to SE).
• Subjects had high mix of conditions, which led to much categorizing (data-fishing) with unimpressive results.

Generalizations:
• Five case series were found for topiramte in bipolar disorders, all except one were for adjunctive therapy.
• Of the two larger studies, one had severe methodologic limitations (Marcotte); the other (McElroy) more rigorous study showed good results for mania but was limited by a high drop out rate.
• No studies could control for clinician/patient bias, placebo effect, natural course of illness, and effect of other drugs.
• Most studies used refractory patients
• No studies had clean exclusion/inclusion criteria.

Return to top of the page


Reviewer:
Joseph Sharpe

MANIA IN LATE LIFE:  FOCUS ON AGE AT ONSET

Source: American Journal of Psychiatry 149:7, July 1992
Authors: Robert Young, M.D. and Gerald Klerman, M.D. 

Category: Review 

Summary: The authors review diagnosis and classification of Bipolar disorder including incidence and prevalence of mania in the elderly. This paper emphasizes the limited number of systematic studies available, however they do explore the existing literature and discuss several aspects of psychopathology and how each relates to age and age-onset. Included in there analysis of Bipolar disorder are manic affective features, dysphoria and mixed states, delusions/psychotic features, and cognitive dysfunction. This paper focuses on late-onset bipolar noting trends and/or studies that are appropriate to this target group.

Diagnosis/classification/prevalence/incidence:
Types of bipolar include

    Type I: hospitalized at least once for mania plus history of depression
    Type II: not-hospitalized due to hypomania plus history of depression
    Type III:' cyclothymia' fluctuations in mood without mania or severe depression
    Type IV: Mania is associated with illnesses or medications
    Type V: Major depression with strong family hx of bipolar Type VI: Hx of mania but no depression 'uni polar mania'
Prevalence: - 5% of diagnosis of elderly patients referred for treatment of affective illness. This however represents recurrent early-life illness and late-onset.

Incidence: Limited data. Conflicting reports. Both sexes show the association with age was weaker for mania than for depression.

Etiology: Probands with late onset bipolar disorder have a lower rate of affective disorder among their relatives than do probands with early onset. Drugs of abuse have been associated with cases of mania in which age of onset is greater than 40 years. Manic patients aged greater than or equal to 60 with onset of first manic episode after age 58 had antidepressant pharmicotherapy associated with their index episode more often than elderly manic patients with onset at an earlier age. Manic symptoms can occur with cerebrovascular disease, as well as other focal brain lesions. Right-side lesions have been particularly implicated in the pathogenesis of mania.

  1. Manic affective features: Slater and Roth have stated that many cases of mania in the elderly are 'milder' than in younger patients. Although this is only from clinical impressions. Older patients tended to have lower GAFs when symptomatic.
  2. Dysphoria and mixed states: Post has suggested that older manic patients exhibit concomitant depressive features more often than younger patients.
  3. Delusions and other psychotic features: Post has stated that compared to younger patients, geriatric manic patients more often have persecutory delusions that are not mood-congruent. Again though this is only a clinical observation. Rosen et al. Has reported a negative association between psychotic symptoms and late onset bipolar pt.s.
  4. Cognitive Dysfunction: Broadhead and Jacoby have stated that a greater proportion of elderly than of young manic patients performed in the demented range on the Kendrick neuropsychological battery. In a retrospective study, those who were older than 58 yrs. at the time of the first manic episode more often showed evidence of cognitive dysfunction in routine clinical evaluations when they were acutely symptomatic than did patients with earlier onset.
  5. Resolution of Acute Episode: Some studies have suggested an association between greater age at onset and greater duration of episode and/or chronicity. However these studies do not differentiate between age at onset and age alone.
  6. Relapse: MacDonald has noted an association between greater age and shorter intervals between episodes in pt.s with bipolar. Stone has reported an increase in frequency of readmission, over 1-month to 10-yr follow up, for those with histories of previous affective episodes than for those without such history.
  7. Mortality: Observed mortality rate for elderly bipolar pt.s appears to be greater than the base rate for this age group in the community. Neither Dhingra and Rabins nor Shulman et al. detected a difference in mortality between geriatric patients with late onset of illness and patients of the same age with early onset of illness.
  8. Cognitive Dysfunction/Dementia: Dhingra and Rabins could not detect differences in cognitive impairment, as assesses by MMSE score, between patients with late-onset mania and geriatric patients with early-onset mania at 5 and 7 yr follow ups.
  9. Treatment: Differences in treatment in regards of age have not been explored however consideration must be given to factors that influence drug pharmokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
  10. Pharmacokinetics: Reduced lithium clearance can be associated with increased age. The volume of distribution, because of increased fat/lean body mass ratio, may also be reduced. Lower doses of lithium might be needed to achieve equivalent plasma levels.
  11. Efficacy of Acute Pharmacotherapy: Schaffer and Garvey suggest that lithium levels below 1.0 meq/liter can be effective in some elderly patients. Broadhead and Jacoby did not note differences in therapeutic response in relation to age at onset.
Conclusion: late-life illness may be more heterogenous. It appears less genetically determined. Older adults seem to be more susceptible to iatrogenic mania. Late life onset of bipolar may reflect vulnerability acquired through brain changes and disorders associated with aging. There is not a tremendous amount of information regarding late-onset bipolar.

Return to top of the page


IN PATIENTS WITH POSTPARTUM ONSET OF MANIC SYMPTOMS IS THE INITIAL PRESENTATION AND RECURRENCE OF MANIA ATTRIBUTED OR IMPACTED BY THE POSTPARTUM STATE

Reference: Videbech P, Gouliaev G, First admission with puerperal psychosis: 4-14 years of follow-up

Methods:

Design: Retrospective Cohort study

Setting: The study took place in Denmark where women were admitted to psychiatric hospitals for the first time with postpartum psychosis were identified by using the national personal identification number to link data from the Danish Psychiatric Central Register with the Danish Medical Birth register.

Inclusion Criteria: 
first admission to a psychiatric department in the years 1973 to 1980; 
admission within 12 months after a parturition; 
diagnosis at discharge was psychosis (ICD-8 290 to 299) 
and all admissions took place at the psychiatric departments in Arhus County, Arhus psychiatric hospital or the psychiatric wards in the cities of Silkeborg or Randers with a well-defined catchment of approximately 600,000 inhabitants.

Control Group: every proband had two controls with inclusion criteria of 1) they delivered at the same maternity ward in the same year and 2) they had same parity and approximately the same age.

Outcomes: Primary: Evaluate women who had first time diagnoses and admissions to psychiatric hospitals following delivery of the first child and compare certain demographical variables with those of the background population and to investigate whether obstetrical factors could contribute to the development of the disorder.

Description of Prognosis factors considered: Mental disorder, hospitalizations, medications and social functioning.

Validity

  1. Was the patient sample clearly defined, representative of clinical practice, and captured in a similar point in disease progression? Yes

  2. Was the duration of follow-up sufficient? Yes. Were all patients accounted for? Yes

  3. Were outcome criteria objective and unbiased relative to prognostic factors? Yes

  4. Was their adjustment for linked prognostic factors? No

  5. Were pts in study treated similarly? Yes

  6. Ds the study population describe my patient? Yes, somewhat

Results